SunTrust Investment Services Inc.

Latin American Investor Files Six-Figure Northstar (Bermuda) Fraud Claim Against Truist Investment Services

Published on: May 19, 2021 | by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP

Former SunTrust Advisory Services Investment Adviser Luisa Gonzales Unsuitably Recommended Northstar Bermuda Products

A senior investor has filed a Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) arbitration claim seeking up to $500K in damages against Truist Investment Services for losses he suffered in Northstar Financial Services (Bermuda). The claimant is a retired Catholic Priest who lives in Bogota, Colombia, and was a longtime client of SunTrust Bank.

Truist Investment Services is SunTrust’s brokerage arm and is based in the United States. Ex-SunTrust Advisory Services investment adviser, Luisa Gonzales, was this investor’s financial representative.

Jubilado entabla reclamación de fraude por $500,000 contra Truist Investment Services por inversión en Northstar Financial Services (Islas Bermudas)

Published on: March 10, 2021 | by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP

Inversionista Latinoamericano alega Abuso y Fraude Financiero contra Ancianos

En una reclamación de arbitraje ante la Autoridad Reguladora de la Industria Financiera (FINRA) contra Truist Investment Services, Inc. (t/c/c SunTrust Investment Services, Inc.), un jubilado de América Latina reclama hasta $500 mil en daños. La reclamante sostiene que su corredora le recomendó inadecuadamente invertir dicha cantidad de dinero en Northstar Financial Services (Bermuda) Ltd. La compañía solicitó protección por quiebra el año pasado.

Truist es la unidad de corredores/agentes de bolsa de SunTrust Bank. La compañía está registrada con FINRA. Los agentes de ambas entidades promovieron fuertemente los productos de inversión y anualidades de renta fija y variable de Northstar Financial Services (Bermuda), los cuales pagaban comisiones, bonos y otros incentivos que eran mayores que los ofrecidos por los productos más típicos de SunTrust Bank.

Customers Blame Ex-Wells Fargo Broker Clearing Services Herbert Weith For Variable Annuity Losses

Published on: December 28, 2020 | by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP

New FINRA Arbitration Claim Seeks $260K in Damages

Former Wells Fargo Clearing Services (WRET) broker Herbert Lee Weith IV is named in yet another customer dispute in which the claimant is seeking damages for losses involving variable annuities. Weith, who was a Wells Fargo broker from 2012 to 2019 in Naples, Florida, became a registered investment advisor for Equitable Advisors, LLC, in Columbia, Maryland from January to October of 2020.

Our Florida broker fraud attorneys have been looking into complaints by ex-Wells Fargo customers of Weith who suffered serious investment losses that may have been caused by unsuitable investment recommendations. Contact our attorneys at Shepherd Smith Edwards and Kantas (SSEK Law Firm at investorlawyers.com) today.

SunTrust Robinson Humphrey Ordered to Pay $4.1 Million to Former Institutional Salesperson for Alleged Defamation and Wrongful Termination

Published on: January 7, 2010 | by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP

A FINRA arbitration panel is ordering SunTrust Robinson Humphrey, Inc. to pay $4.1 million to a former institutional salesperson who claims he was defamed in a regulatory filing and wrongfully terminated. SunTrust Robinson Humphrey is the corporate and investment bank services unit of SunTrust Banks, Inc.

Lance B. Beck, who worked for the company 19 years and sold debt securities, claims he was slated to gross more than $3 million when, following the auction-rate securities market collapse, he was let go. According to a regulatory filing for the former institutional salesman, his case against his former employer involves a $2.9 million ARS transaction with a institutional customer. SunTrust later decided to repurchase the securities.

Beck is accusing SunTrust of making disclosures on his Form U5 that were “devastating,” and prevented him from getting hired by other companies or take his book of business with him. Beck wanted certain language in the form, which brokerage firms have to submit to regulators when a broker leaves the company, expunged.

SunTrust Investment Services to Pay $700,000 Fine to Settle FINRA Charges of Excessive Commission and Supervisory Violations Involving Fee-Based Brokerage Business

Published on: October 23, 2008 | by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority has announced that SunTrust Investment Services Inc. has agreed to pay a $700,000 fine to settle allegations that it engaged in supervisory violations involving its fee-based brokerage business and charged excessive commissions on low-priced stocks. By agreeing to settle, the investment firm is not admitting to or denying the charges.

SunTrust terminated its Portfolio Choice accounts, which were fee-based accounts, in 2006. The charges by FINRA involve the period between November 2002 and December 2005 when SunTrust opened more than 2,644 Portfolio Choice accounts without properly evaluating whether the accounts were the appropriate fit for customers. According to FINRA, SunTrust neglected to properly monitor the Portfolio Choice accounts to make sure that they continued to be the appropriate account choice for clients.

FINRA found that at least 36 Portfolio Choice accounts that did not engage in any trades for at least eight quarters-yet these accounts were charged more than $129,000 in fees during the last four quarters. FINRA also says that a number of SunTrust Portfolio Choice clients paid an asset-based fee and transaction commission on the same assets.

FINRA was able to identify over 900 incidents when SunTrust neglected to exclude a customer asset that was purchased with a commission from the asset base that is used to determine the account fee. The error resulted in customers being charged twice, leading to about $437,500 in commissions and excess fees for SunTrust clients.

FINRA also accused the investment firm of acting inappropriately when it let a number of customers keep their accounts and pay for them even though they had not traded for years. Between January 2002 and September 2, 2005, FINRA says SunTrust did not establish a supervisor system that could make sure that registered representatives would charges clients fair commissions on securities transactions. The firm used an automated commission system that charged commission of more than 5% when low quantities and/or low-priced stocks were sold or purchased. Because of this, some clients were billed excess commissions nearing $100,000 in total.

Also as part of its settlement, SunTrust said it would certify that it returned $713,362 in interest and fees to clients that were affected by the alleged violations. FINRA says it took this voluntary refund into account when assessing its fine against SunTrust.

Related Web Resources:

SunTrust Investment Services

FINRA
Continue Reading ›