Articles Posted in Investor Fraud

After two months of deliberation, a jury has found Ex-DHB Industries CEO David Brooks and Ex-DHB Industries COO Sandra Hatfield guilty of committing securities fraud, insider trading, and obstruction of justice. The two defendants allegedly made close to $200 million as a result of their scam. The jury also found Brooks guilty of lying to auditors.

Prosecutors claimed that Brooks and Hatfield manipulated financial records to increase company earnings and profit margins. This resulted in the inflation of stock prices. The defendants are also accused of committing insider trading from when they sold over $72 million of their DHB stock in November 2004 and then another (approximately) $118 million of their shares the following month. The sales occurred as DHB’s stock price went up to over $20/share. Hatfield made over $5 million while Brooks realized over $180 million from the scheme.

Also, Hatfield and Brooks allegedly took part in a scheme to cover up the related party status of Tactical Armor Products, which Brooks’ wife was supposed to be running separate from DHB. In fact, Brooks wholly controlled TAP. According to the Federal of Bureau of Investigation’s New York Division Web site, profits from related party transactions were used to pay for over $16 million in Brooks’ personal expenses. He reportedly doctored internal DHB documents and created fraudulent multi-million dollar transactions to cover up the scheme and fool investors and auditors. Personal expenditures included plastic surgery for his wife, luxury vehicles, pills for his 100 racing horses, his family’s use of the company jet, and other charges.

The two defendants are each facing up to 25 years in prison.

Related Web Resources:
David H. Brooks, Founder and Former Chief Executive Officer of DHB Industries, Inc. and Sandra Hatfield, Former Chief Operating Officer, Convicted of Insider Trading, Fraud, and Obstruction of Justice: Defendants Reaped Nearly $200 Million Through Their Schemes, FBI, September 14, 2010
Body armor chief guilty of $190 million fraud: jury, Reuters, September 14, 2010 Continue Reading ›

According to the US Securities and Exchange Commission, Sean David Morton has bilked more than 100 investors of over six million dollars as the mastermind of an alleged offering fraud scheme. The man who calls himself “America’s Prophet” never professed to have a financial background. However, he is accused of promising prospective investors that he would use his psychic gifts to predict the movements of the stock market and advise his investing team.

The SEC claims Morton told investors he would use their funds to trade in foreign currencies and that profits would be distributed pro rata among them. The federal agency says that Morton, who describes himself as an intuitive consultant and trained Remote Viewer, lied to these investors about having a successful track record for being able to predict when the market will rise and crash. He also allegedly lied about how their money would be used, fund liquidity, and that profits were audited and certified.

Morton allegedly invested only half of the investors’ money in foreign currency trading firms. He is accused of diverting the rest, including at least $240,000 into his Prophecy Research Institute, a nonprofit religious group. Morton also allegedly commingled investors’ funds among the different entity accounts. The SEC contends that the defendant did not seek accreditation status from Delphi Investment Group investors.

Morton, Vajra Productions LLC, Magic Eight Ball Distributing, Inc., 27 Investments LLC, and Delphi Investment Group are the defendants in the SEC’s investment fraud lawsuit. Morton’s wife, Melissa, and Prophecy Research Institute are named relief defendants. The Mortons controls the entity defendants.

Federal regulators continue to warn investors that they must make sure that anyone they entrust with investing their funds is properly licensed. Unfortunately, many people are misled into investing in securities scams that end up costing them their hard-earned money and financial security.

Related Web Resources:
Investment ‘Psychic’ Accused of Financial Fraud, ABC News, March 8, 2010
Read the SEC Complaint, SEC.gov Continue Reading ›

Many investors were told that investing in CIT preferred stock and bonds was safe and appropriate for them. Some sales pitches were based on the $2.3 billion government bailout of CIT. This is just another example of material misrepresentations and omissions in the sale of fixed income products, which have become rampant on Wall Street.

There are some reports that misrepresentations were made to sell CIT securities to smaller institutions and individuals even as Wall Street and large institutions were unloading their own holdings of CIT. This is similar to claims made concerning the sales of auction-rate securities and recommendations prior to the Lehman, Fannie Mae, and Freddie Mac debacles.

This week, the 101-year-old commercial lender announced that it is filing for bankruptcy in an attempt to get rid of $10 billion in debt. Not only has CIT run out of funding, but also a US bailout and debt exchange offer faltered.

CIT says it will continue to stay in business and that bankruptcy will allow the commercial lender to keep providing funding to middle-market and small business clients.

With $64.9 billion in debt and assets valued at $71 billion, it is unlikely that the government will recover a lot of the $2.3 billion in taxpayer money that the commercial lender received under the Troubled Asset Relief Program.

CIT says bondholder support will allow it to get out of bankruptcy pretty quickly-two months is its current estimate. A prepackaged bankruptcy plan has been approved.

CIT’s prepackaged plan outline stated that majority of noteholders would get new notes at 70 cents on the dollar in addition to new common stock.

CIT is the country’s biggest lender to mid-sized and small businesses. CIT funds some 1 million businesses. It is the number one aircraft financier and the number three biggest US railcar-leasing firm. CIT finances trades in North America, Europe, and Asia.

Related Web Resources:
CIT Files Bankruptcy; U.S. Unlikely to Recoup Money, Bloomberg.com, Nov 1, 2009
Lender CIT files for bankruptcy, Portland Business Journal, November 2, 2009
Troubled Asset Relief Program, Federal Reserve
Chapter 11 Bankruptcy
Continue Reading ›

Former Congressman Michael Huffington is suing Carlyle Group, a private equity firm, and affiliated companies for more than $20 million in investment losses. Huffington, the ex-husband of columnist Arianna Huffington, says he was misled about the safety of a fund that contained mortgage-backed securities. The closed-end fund, Carlyle Capital, was supposed to be a low-risk investment fund. Huffington says he invested $20 million in the fund.

Huffington, who was a member of the California House from 1993 to 1995, filed his investment fraud lawsuit against Carlyle and Carlyle Capital executives in Massachusetts Superior Court. Huffington is accusing David M. Rubenstein, Carlyle managing director and co-founder, of misrepresenting the funds’ risks during conversations.

Huffington also contends that in March 2007, John Stomber, the head of Carlyle Capital, told investors that the fund wasn’t exposed to high-risk investments. Huffington says that in August 2007, Stomber told investors that the fund was performing on target. A report in 2008 stated that the fund’s returns were in line with near-term targets. Yet two weeks later, Huffington contends that the equity of the shareholders was gone. In March 2008, Rubenstein contacted Huffington to let him know that the fund had defaulted on its debts and lenders were selling the collateral.

Carlyle Capital was supposed to borrow money to purchase the securities and then make money on the difference between what was earned on the interest paid on the bonds and the firm’s borrowing costs. The fund collapsed after lenders made repeated margin calls. The private equity firm and its investors lost $700 million.

Related Web Resources:
High-Profile Investor Sues Carlyle Group, Forbes.com, July 13, 2009
Carlyle Sued Over Fund’s Losses, Forbes.com, July 13, 2009 Continue Reading ›

Hedge fund investment adviser Hennessee Group, LLC has reached an agreement with the Securities and Exchange Commission over its securities fraud probe into Bayou Group and hedge fund manage Samuel Goldberg. Investors lost some $400 million in the scam. Now, Hennessee Group and principal Charles J Gradante will pay over $814,000 to settle charges that Hennessee failed to do the correct due diligence before recommending Bayou Group to investors.

According to the SEC, investors placed over $65 million with Bayou Group between 2002 and 2005. Hennessee collected over $500,000 in advisory fees. However, the SEC charges that Hennessee failed to perform the type of due diligence they told investors that they engage in. The firm failed to check up on Bayou Group’s relationship with its auditor and did not follow up on emails sent by investors questioning the ties between the auditor and Bayou Group cofounder Daniel Marino. It would later come to light that Israel and Marino established a bogus accounting firm and Marino signed fake audits.

Israel was sentenced to 20-years in jail but pretended to kill himself and disappeared on the day he was supposed to go to jail. He later turned himself into authorities and is waiting to receive his sentence for fleeing. Marino is serving a 20-year prison term.

Also last week, Marino’s brother, Matthew Marino, was sentenced to 21-months in prison for his role in the investment fraud scam. He has been ordered to pay $60 million in restitution.

Prosecutors had accused Matthew of knowing that Bayou executives were committing investment fraud and that Richmond-Fairfield Associates was a bogus accounting firm. He was accused of helping conceal the fraud by taking part in the scheme, concealing documents, and making changes to a certain bogus document.

Related Web Resources:
Hennessee Group Settles SEC Charges In Bayou Hedge Fund Fraud; Agency Says Hennessee Skimped On Due Diligence, Ponzi News, April 22, 2009
Hennessee Settles SEC Case Over Bayou, Hedgefund.net, April 22, 2009
Ex-Bayou Exec’s Brother Sentenced To 21 Months In Prison, Wall Street Journal, April 22, 2009 Continue Reading ›

About 7,500 General Motors workers recently agreed to a buyout of early retirement incentives and leave the company. Chrysler, Ford and many suppliers of the industry have also made offers to entice workers to take early retirement. This follows tens of thousands of other industry workers who have been bought-out of pension and other benefits in recent years.

Many who retire have little if any experience in investing and are soon beseiged by droves of salespersons hawking financial plans. In the past, strict laws and regulations were enforced regarding investors’ funds, especially retirement funds. However, as we have recently witnessed, securities regulators appear to be overwhelmed or incompetent.

For decades, Wall Street has blamed any abuse of investors on a few “rogue” brokers. Yet, many now believe that Wall Street is actually rotten to the core. In fact, the majority of financial advisors sincerely and diligently seek to serve their clients, although many of the investment products they are told to sell are inappropriate, riddled with costs or just plain fraudulent. Sadly, too many of the worst advisors attract unwary investors with false promises.

Victims of financial abuse are often unaware that they can seek recovery of undue investment losses according to the law. But investors must understand that the regulators “police” the securities industry and write tickets when they catch the bad guys. In order to recover, victims must hire an attorney to represent them in court or in securities arbitration.
Continue Reading ›

The Securities and Exchange Commission is charging Robert Allen Stanford and three of his companies for their alleged involvement in a multibillion dollar investment fraud scheme. His companies that are named in the complaint include Stanford International Bank (SIB), Stanford Group Company (SGC), which is a Houston-based investment adviser and broker dealer, and Stanford Capital Management, which is based in Antigua. The SEC is asking for emergency relief for the investors that have been victimized by the alleged scheme.

The SEC complaint, filed in Dallas, Texas accuses Stanford and friends and family that he works with of orchestrating the investor scam. The SEC claims that SIB used SGC financial advisers to sell some $8 billion worth of “certificates of deposit” to investors with the promise they would receive high interest rates that were, in fact, unsubstantiated and improbable. The SEC says the defendants misrepresented these CD’s when they told investors that they were safe.

The SEC complaint also contends that another scam involving $1.2 billion in sales of Stanford Allocation Strategy (SAS), which is a proprietary mutual fund wrap program, involved the use of materially bogus historical performance information that helped SGC to grow the SAS program from under $10 million in 2004 to over $1 billion. In 2007 and 2008 , SGC earned fees of about $25 million as a result. The program’s bogus performance was used to bring in registered investment advisers with substantial books of business. These advisers were then provided with substantial incentives to transfer client assets to SIB’s CD program.

The U.S. District Court for the Central District of California has slapped Lincoln Funds International Inc with a temporary restraining order and told the advisory firm to temporarily freeze its assets. Judge Cormac J. Carney also appointed a temporary receiver over the assets, as well as the assets of three Lincoln Biotech Venture funds and Brookstone Capital, which is Lincoln Fund’s predecessor company.

Lincoln Funds, along with its three principals, are accused of engaging in a biotechnology investment fraud scam, raising over $21.8 million from hundreds of investors. According to the SEC, Robert L. Carver, his son Robert L. Carver II, and James L. DeMer sold securities in Lincoln Funds, the three biotech funds, and Brookstone Capital while making “baseless predictions” and promising that there would be initial public offerings at the two companies.

The Commission charges that the defendants took part in “sham transactions” to make it appear as if Lincoln Funds was not associated with Brookstone or Carver because both had been subject to state regulatory orders. It is also accusing the defendants of misappropriating and misusing at least $2.5 million in investor funds, defrauding the partnerships as a result.

In Los Angeles Superior Court, a number of life insurance companies, mutual funds, retirement systems, and other investors are suing Wachovia Securities LLC for alleged fraud related to the sale of senior subordinated notes for beverage maker Le Nature’s Inc. The Pennsylvania-based company filed for bankruptcy in 2006.

Causes of action include fraud, negligent misrepresentation, aiding and abetting fraud, and fraudulent inducement. California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS) and the Nature Conservancy are among the scores of plaintiffs.

The plaintiffs are accusing Wachovia of knowing about the fraud and financial problems at Le Nature’s but keeping this information from investors so that the beverage company would keep paying the firm substantial fees. They say the lack of disclosure also helped Wachovia’s high-yield debt business.

Sidney Mondschein, a former WFG Investment stockbroker, must disgorge $53,000 in ill-gotten gains he allegedly obtained when he defrauded over 500 senior investors by selling their confidential data to insurance brokers. Last month, Mondschein settled Securities and Exchange Commission charges before the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California.

By settling, the SEC says that the former broker is not admitting to or denying the charges. As part of his agreement, Mondschein agreed to a bar preventing him from associating with any dealers or brokers for five years. He is also permanently enjoined from violating the 1934 Securities Exchange Act’s Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5, as well as Regulation S-P. He must also pay a $45,000 penalty.

The SEC complaint has alleged that Mondschein illegally sold for profit the confidential data of over 500 clients, almost all of them senior citizens, to six insurance agents. Information included contact information and, sometimes, the dollar figure that an investor had spent on the last annuity. This sale allowed the insurance brokers to sell the investors more annuity products, even though the majority of them already had purchased equity-indexed or fixed annuities.

Contact Information