Puerto Rico Bond Funds

UBS Ordered to Pay Older Couple $700K Over Puerto Rico Bond Sales While Institutional Investors Continue Lawsuits in Puerto Rico Over Investment Losses

Published on: November 29, 2016 | by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP

A Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) panel is ordering UBS Financial Services, Inc. (“UBS”) to pay Puerto Rico residents over $700,000 in damages. The FINRA panel ordered UBS to pay $549,000 in compensatory damages to a defunct car rental business belonging to Luis Vega, as well as over $165,000 to Teresa Rosas, who is Vega’s former wife. The firm must also pay over $100,000 in costs and hearing session fees.

Vega and Rosas filed their case against UBS accusing the brokerage firm of securities fraud, negligence, recklessness, and deceit. Vega, 87, invested almost $8 million through his Condado Motors with UBS broker Jose Chaves between ’06 and ’11. During that time, Chaves invested approximately 95% of the money in three of UBS’s Puerto Rico close-end funds, even taking out loans to cover some of the costs. The couple’s lawyer claims that Chavez did not disclose any risks involved other than what was noted in the funds’ prospectus. Additionally, Rosas bought over 17,000 shares of the UBS Puerto Rico Fixed Income Fund III.

The couple saw their investments lose the bulk of their value when the prices for the Puerto Rico bonds and Puerto Rico closed-end funds dropped in 2013. According to their lawyer, Condado Motors lost $3.9 million in value, as well as $823,650 in net out-of-pocket losses, during 2013. The couple said that their financial problems played a part in their decision to get a divorce.

UBS Financial Services to Pay Investor Almost $1M in Puerto Rico Closed-End Bond Fraud Case

Published on: November 8, 2016 | by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP

A Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) arbitration panel has ordered UBS Financial Services (UBS) to pay Ana Elisa Ciordia-Robles almost $1 million, including $751,000 in compensatory damages and additional sums for legal fees and costs. Ciordia-Robles accused UBS of negligent supervision, breach of fiduciary duty, fraud, negligence, breach of contract, and violations of the Puerto Rico Uniform Securities Act, the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Rule 10b-5, and the Securities Exchange Act’s Sections 10(b). More specifically, Ciordia-Robles claimed she sustained losses from investing in UBS Puerto Rico (UBS-PR) closed-end bond funds.

When Puerto Rico muni bonds dropped in value in 2013, many investors on the island and in the mainland sustained huge investment losses. In the last few years, UBS and UBS-PR have been the subject of thousands of customer complaints over their sale of Puerto Rico municipal bond and proprietary bond funds. Claimants are alleging that these investments were unsuitable, that high concentrations of these investments were recommended, and that UBS never apprised them of the risks involved in the closed-end bond funds that they were sold. Many of these investors have since realized that their portfolios were never equipped to handle these risks.

It was just last year that UBS consented to pay about $34 million to US regulators to settle allegations related to its supervision of the sale of the Puerto Rico bond funds and use of leverage against those closed-end funds. UBS has already settled a number civil claims brought by investors through FINRA arbitration. At Shepherd Smith Edwards and Kantas, LTD LLP our securities lawyers have been working hard to help quite a number of these investors recoup these losses.

Hedge Funds with Puerto Rico Revenue Bonds Want Court to Delay General Obligation Bondholders’ Lawsuit

Published on: October 27, 2016 | by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP

A battle of hedge funds, and their competing interests, has erupted in Puerto Rico over the last few weeks. This week, hedge funds Tilden Park Capital Management LP, Whitebox Advisors LLC, Merced Capital LP, and GoldenTree Asset Management LP filed a motion asking a court to impose a legal stay that would delay the lawsuit filed by general obligation bondholders that want Puerto Rico to stop directing sales-tax revenue away from the general fund. These hedge funds that submitted the motion collectively hold about $2 billion of tax revenue bonds, which are called COFINA bonds, locally.

Meantime, the general obligation bondholders that filed the lawsuit are also hedge funds. They include entities under the management of Aurelius Capital Management, FCO Advisors, Autonomy Capital, Covalent Partners, Monarch Alternative Capital, and Stone Lion Capital Partners. Earlier this month, they asked a court to stop the island from using sales-tax revenue to pay back COFINA debt. Those funds believe that the sales tax revenue should pay back the general obligation bonds first because Puerto Rico’s constitution states that general obligation should be repaid before other debt. However, the hedge funds holding the COFINAs that are requesting the legal stay are arguing that COFINA’s share of the sales-and-use-tax should not be “subject to clawback” in the event of a payment shortfall of the general obligation bonds.

This fight is playing out at the same time the U.S. Government is trying to help the U.S. Commonwealth with its financial crisis. PROMESA, which stands for the Puerto Rico Oversight Management and Economic Stability Act, is the new law that includes the legal stay that the CONFINA holders want imposed. The stay postpones creditor lawsuits against the island until February 15, 2017 in order to give Puerto Rico time to work out how to repay the $70 billion of debt it owes. Although Puerto Rico is way overdue on $1.8 billion of principal plus interest payments, this includes what the island owes on general obligation bonds, the Commonwealth paying back COFINAs.
Continue Reading ›

Hedge Funds Holding Puerto Rico General Obligation Bonds File Lawsuit

Published on: October 11, 2016 | by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP

A number of hedge funds with Puerto Rico general obligation bonds want a court to stop the U.S. territory from using its sales-tax revenue to pay back other debt. Those hedge funds say that such an action is a violation of the Commonwealth’s constitution.

To date, the Commonwealth owes nearly $13 billion of general obligation bonds. Under its constitution, Puerto Rico is required to pay back its general obligation bonds before paying off other expenses. According to the plaintiffs, part of the territory’s’ sales tax revenue is supposed to go toward that repayment.

The plaintiffs sued Puerto Rico Governor Alejandro Garcia Padilla to stop the territory from moving money away from bondholders, which they say violates the new federal law concerning Puerto Rico, called PROMESA. The hedge funds submitted their amended complaint last week, in which they added the Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., commonly called COFINA, as a defendant. The plaintiffs include entities under the management of Aurelius Capital Management, Covalent Partners, Autonomy Capital, Monarch Alternative Capital, FCO Advisors, and Stone Lion Capital Partners.

The Puerto Rico Retirement System Sues UBS Over Municipal Bonds While 31 Investment Funds and Scotiabank Sue the Territory in Separate Lawsuits

Published on: September 28, 2016 | by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP

According to Bloomberg, the retirement system of Puerto Rico has joined a lawsuit against UBS Financial Services, Inc. (UBS) for poor returns that the retirement system received on $3 billion the it borrowed on UBS’s recommendation. Six beneficiaries originally brought this Puerto Rico bond fraud case in 2011 against UBS and two smaller broker-dealers.UBS was the underwriter of bonds sold by the judiciary retirement systems and employees eight years ago. UBS also served as investment consultant, adviser, and bond fund manager. The bond proceeds were supposed to earn a positive return as compared to the interest paid on the bonds. According to UBS, this would help Puerto Rico resolve some of its pension shortfall. However, UBS, according to the complaint, put too much of the bond proceeds toward low-yielding accounts that made “negative income.”

Now, Puerto Rico’s pension funds are in financial trouble and could go broke as early as 2018. System administrator Pedro R. Ortiz said that the system’s board is looking to obtain a “significant recovery” for pensioners and participants.

UBS Ordered To Pay Three Investors $750K in Puerto Rico Bond Fraud Case

Published on: September 13, 2016 | by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority announced that UBS Financial Services and its Puerto Rico subsidiary (UBS) must collectively pay three investors $750,000 in damages for losses they sustained from investing in UBS’s proprietary Puerto Rico closed-end bond funds and Puerto Rico bonds. The claimants are Jenny Robles Adorno, Desarrollos Jarra SE, and Jose A. Rivera.

The investors accused UBS of recklessness, fraud, and negligence. They sought compensatory damages, punitive damages, and reimbursement of commissions that they said were unlawful. In San Juan, the FINRA arbitration panel awarded Rivera $562,500, Robles $30,000 and Jarra $157,500. UBS said it was “disappointed” with the panel’s decision to award any damages to the claimants.

This is not the first Puerto Rico bond fraud arbitration case in which UBS has been ordered to pay investors. Just this March, the firm had to pay over $470,000 to three investors who said their accounts were over-concentrated in the same Puerto Rico focused investments. The claimants in that particular case alleged negligent supervision and fraud. Similarly, UBS was ordered to pay a former television executive over $1,400,000 in the fall of 2015 for over-concentrating the former customer in UBS’s proprietary funds and misrepresenting the risks of those investments.

President Obama Appoints Federal Control Board Members to Deal With Puerto Rico’s Debt Crisis

Published on: September 6, 2016 | by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP

The White House has appointed seven people to the Fiscal Control Board tasked with helping Puerto Rico deal with its $70B of debt. The appointees, named by President Obama, include: Jose Ramon Gonzalez (Federal Home Loan Bank of NY CEO/President), Arthur Gonzalez (Ex-bankruptcy Judge), Ana Matosantos (Ex-California Dept. of Finance Director), Carlos Garcia (Ex-Puerto Rico Government Development Bank president and CEO/Founder of BayBoston Managers LLC), Jose Carrion III (Puerto Rico insurance executive), Andrew Biggs (Scholar) and David Skeel (University of Pennsylvania Law Professor). Three of these board member are Democrats, four are Republicans. The eighth member of the board is Puerto Rico’s governor Alejandro Garcia Padilla. He is an automatic member because of his position but does not have a vote.

The creation of the federal control board was part of the Puerto Rico Oversight, Management, and Economic Stability Act (PROMESA). The legislation was passed by the U.S. Congress to help the U.S. territory with its financial woes. Puerto Rico has been defaulting on its debt payments that have been due. Just last week, the Government Development Bank of Puerto did not pay almost $10 million of interest that was due on it outstanding bonds. According to a recent report by the ReFund America Project, which has been investigating the U.S. territory’s debt, approximately $1.6 billion of the island’s debt are the fees earned by Wall Street firms, such as Citigroup (C), UBS (UBS), Barclays Capital (BARC), and Goldman Sachs (GS). Even worse, the ReFund America Project said that about $323 million of the money paid to Wall Street firms was for “scoop and toss” deals involving UBS as the main underwriter.

The report also stated that close to half of the $134 million in debt Puerto Rico and its public corporations have issued over the last 16 years is refunding debt. Puerto Rico’s financials purportedly show that the territory had been putting out new refunding bonds to pay back bonds that had been issued earlier. The use of refunding bonds to delay current debt payments for later is what is involved in “scoop and toss” financing.

Two Investors File Securities Arbitration Claim Against Santander Securities Over Puerto Rico Municipal Bonds

Published on: August 22, 2016 | by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP

Two investors, seeking to recover the investment losses they sustained in Puerto Rico municipal bonds, are pursuing a FINRA arbitration claim against Santander Securities LLC. According to the case, the Puerto Rican investors are claiming breach of fiduciary duty, violation of common law fraud, negligent supervision, and the unsuitable investment of their money in the Puerto Rico Public Finance Corporation RFDG Commonwealth Appropriation Series A Bond. Santander Securities is a Banco Santander (SAN) subsidiary.

These investors are among the thousands seeking to recover the money they lost in Puerto Rico bonds and Puerto Rico closed-end bonds after brokerage firms, such as Santander Securities, Banco Popular, and UBS Puerto Rico (UBS-PR) recommended that they invest in these securities. Many investors were never equipped to handle the risks involved in Puerto Rico bonds yet their broker encouraged them to invest, ignoring suitability rules and often misrepresenting the investment.

Last October, Santander agreed to pay $6.4 million to settle allegations related to Puerto Rico bonds, including $4.3 million in restitution to clients in the U.S. territory, as well as a $2 million fine. FINRA, which announced the settlement, said the brokerage unit would repurchase the Puerto Rico bonds from a group of customers that were still holding them. The self-regulatory organization had pursued an enforcement action against Santander Securities because of the way the firm’s brokers sold and bought the bonds during a more than three-year period beginning in 2010.

For many investors, Puerto Rico bonds seemed like a good investment because of the tax benefits they offered, along with a yield that was higher than comparable bonds that were issued by U.S. cities and states. Unfortunately, when the price of the Puerto Rico municipal bonds dropped in 2013, many investors sustained huge losses.

Puerto Rico Likely To Default on Bond Payments Due on August 1

Published on: July 29, 2016 | by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP

On August 1, the U.S. Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and its agencies will owe roughly $346 million in bond payments. This latest deadline comes one month after the U.S. Territory defaulted on nearly $1 billion of bond payments that were due on July 1. According to Bloomberg, here is what is due:

· The Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp. (often called “COFINAs”) owes about $256 million of principal plus interest in COFINAs. S & P Global Ratings has said that the bond trustee has the money to pay the debt that is due next week. COFINAs are paid back from the Commonwealths’ sales tax. This local agency has $15.2 billion of outstanding debt.

· Every month, the territory owes $13.9M of interest, which Puerto Rico has not defaulted on yet.

Hedge Funds Sue Puerto Rico and Its Governor

Published on: July 25, 2016 | by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP

A group of hedge funds that are holding Puerto Rico debt are suing the U.S. territory and Governor Alejandro García Padilla. Monarch Alternative Capital, Aurelius Capital Management, Stone Lion Capital Partners, Covalent Capital Partner, Aurelius Capital Management, Fundamental Credit Opportunities, and a number of other funds claim that Puerto Rico and Governor García violated PROMESA, which stands for the Puerto Rico Oversight, Management and Economic Stability Act. President Barack Obama signed the new debt restructuring law on June 30, which is when García issued a debt moratorium on the nearly $800 million in general obligation debt that was due on July 1 (along with other Puerto Rico debt for a collective total of about $2 billion). The hedge funds say that Governor García had no legal right to call a debt moratorium in the wake of PROMESA.

The bondholders want the court to stop the island from “unlawfully dissipating” assets before a federal oversight board is appointed. PROMESA places the U.S. territory under the supervision of the board, which is tasked with pressing for fiscal reform and supervising spending. However, the board won’t be in place for at least two months.

In their complaint, filed in United States District Court for the District of Puerto Rico, the creditors claimed that Governor García took advantage of this time gap in implementation and is spending hundreds of million dollars in ways that garner “political favor.” The hedge funds argued that certain expenditures would have been challenged by the board if it were already in place.

The plaintiffs, as holders of general obligation bonds, say they are entitled to some of the money being spent because Puerto Rico still owes them the debt payments. They want the district court to freeze the payments that have been issued and mark them as invalid until the board can take a look at them.