Securities Fraud

MetLife Securities Broker Charged with Stealing from 9/11 Victim’s Widow

Published on: October 15, 2007 | by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP

The Securities and Exchange Commission and U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of New York have filed cases accusing a former MetLife employee of what is perhaps a new low in securities fraud: Misappropriation of funds from the widow of a victim of the September 11 terrorist attack on the World Trade Center.

The SEC said that defendant Kevin James Dunn Jr., then an employee of MetLife Securities Inc., was friends with the widow and convinced her to invest her terror-attack compensation funds with him and MetLife. The SEC said Dunn “then proceeded to betray the customer’s trust” by engaging in a “series of material misrepresentations” about the purchase and sale of securities in her account. That and other fraudulent actions were “aimed at swindling [the client] out of a substantial portion” of her 9/11 widow’s compensation.

Dunn allegedly misappropriated $248,000 from the client by creating a joint account in both their names, forging her signature on transaction documents, and “telling her outrageous lies” concerning the status of the account. He also deceived her into providing him with blank checks which he used to deposit funds into his own bank account.

Stock-Loan Traders from Morgan Stanley, Janney Montgomery Scott, and Other Brokerage Firms Charged In $12 Million Stock-Loan Scam by SEC and DOJ

Published on: October 4, 2007 | by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP

The Securities and Exchange Commission and the Department of Justice have separately filed charges against a number of people for their alleged involvement in a $12 million stock-loan fraud scam.

The criminal case involves charges filed for securities fraud conspiracy and other charges against stock-loan traders at Janney Montgomery Scott LLC and Morgan Stanley, including Anthony Lupo, Peter Sherlock, Donato Tramontozzi, Craig DeMizio, and Andrew Caccioppoli.

The DOJ says charges stem from its going investigation kickbacks and bribery that are allegedly happening within the securities industry. It says that securities firms frequently borrow and lend securities to each other, as well as coordinate short-sale transactions. Stock-loan finders look for inventories of a given security and match lenders and borrowers for transactions.

While Former Merrill Lynch & Co. Stockbroker is Found Guilty of Witness Tampering, Seven Other Defendants are Acquitted in “Squawk Box” Securities Fraud Case Involving A.B. Watley Employees

Published on: July 7, 2007 | by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP

In the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York, a jury issued its verdict in the “squawk box” front running case. Seven people were acquitted of securities fraud, while Timothy O’Connell, a former Merrill Lynch & Co. stockbroker was found guilty of making false statements and of witness tampering. The judge, however, declared a mistrial for the one remaining conspiracy count to commit securities fraud against O’Connell. He faces up to 15 years in prison for the convictions, and prosecutors have announced that they will retry the conspiracy charge.

According to prosecutors, O’Connell, and the two other broker defendants, David Ghysels-a former Lehman Brothers broker-and Kenneth Mahaffy-a former Merrill Lynch & Co. brokers, purposely placed off-the-hook phones that were active next to internal speaker systems at their firms.

The purpose of doing this was to let a number of former A.B. Watley employees, including ex-president Robert Malin, former proprietary trading supervisor Keevan Leonard, former compliance director Linus Nwaigwe, and former CEO Michael Picone, listen in while large orders about to be made by institutional clients were broadcast over the boxes.

U.S. Treasury Official Brags of Close Ties to Wall Street in Advancing Support of the “Race to the Bottom” in Compliance Laws

Published on: July 3, 2007 | by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP

The U.S. Treasury Secretary announced the second stage of its “capital markets competitiveness plan” devoted to efforts to “modernize the structure” of the regulatory system for all U.S. financial services providers. The announcement was made before the New York Stock Exchange’s conference on deals and deal-making, hosted by the Wall Street Journal.

As the securities industry is rapidly being globalized, Wall Street insists it can not compete with loose regulations elsewhere in the world unless U.S. standards for reporting, fraud and other wrongdoing are relaxed. Frenzied cries to federal and state officials hype this theme as if the “sky is falling.” Meanwhile, Republicans and Democrats, including candidates for both state and federal office, are taking the bait. Or, perhaps, these candidates know that many of the largest campaign donors around are found on Wall Street.

The fear mongering about losing the battle for listing shares has even invaded the courts as observers, including the SEC, lobby even the U.S. Supreme Court, stating that our nation is on the brink of disaster since it can not compete with foreign markets with almost no oversight.

This Time the Feds -Not the SEC- Abandoned Enron Investors

Published on: June 23, 2007 | by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP

According to reports, the SEC asked the Justice Department’s Office of the Solicitor General to file an amicus curiae (friend of the court) brief to U.S. Supreme Court in support of the Enron investors’ position in a seminal case involving “scheme liability” under a key provision of the federal securities law.

However, lawyers for the Justice Department failed to honor the SEC’s request. After the deadline for such briefs was missed, a spokesman for the U. S. Solicitor General’s Office confirmed that the brief was not filed, while declining to say “whether or when we would file something in the future.”

The case, which has wound its way to the U.S. Supreme Court, was filed against Wall Street banks and brokerage firms for their alleged roles in assisting Enron to defraud its shareholders. Trial was eminent in a Houston Federal Court when a Court of Appeals in New Orleans intervened and said the Securities Exchange Act does not allow such claims. (Congress has forbid all class action claims by investors except under the federal securities laws.)

Defendants Ordered to Pay $14 Millions Over Alleged Prime Bank Scheme

Published on: June 22, 2007 | by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP

A U.S. District Court in Indiana entered a permanent injunction against several defendants charged by the SEC over their alleged involvement in a $32 million prime bank scheme. They were also ordered to pay $14 million in disgorgement, plus other sanctions

The SEC issued a release saying these defendants, including First National Equity LLC, P.K. Trust & Holding Inc., Worldwide T&P Inc. and several individuals, had raised approximately $32 million using while using misrepresenting and omissions to sell interests in a purported system to trade of various financial instruments, including notes.

Shepherd Smith and Edwards is a securities law firm which represents investors nationwide in claims against investment firms. To learn whether our firm can assist you or your firm, contact us to arrange a free confidential consultation with one of our attorneys.

AOL Time Warner Shareholders May be Able to File Late Fraud Claims if Class Certification is Denied.

Published on: June 11, 2007 | by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP

Following the 2001 merger of AOL and Time Warner the stock price of the combined company, AOLTW, went into a year-and-a-half decline, and numerous shareholder class action securities fraud suits were filed. The various class actions were consolidated in a federal court in New York.

If the case is soon dismissed AOL Time Warner Inc. shareholders may be able to bring otherwise expired individual securities fraud claims against the company, but they must first wait for a decision on class certification in a pending lawsuit, a federal court in New York ruled.

When a class action is on file, the statute of limitations for an investor to file an individual claim will be “tolled” (extended while the class action is pending) but such tolling can not be used until “class certification” is approved by the court. The “standby suit”–anticipating the denial of certification– was filed by the investor, but the court determined that, because the limitations periods had expired on the investor’s individual claims his case, and the class action was still pending, tolling during the class action could not be employed and the case was dismissed.

“High Yield” Investment Scam Costing Investors Over $50 Million Results in Conviction of Four

Published on: June 11, 2007 | by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP

A federal jury in Denver found four participants guilty of securities fraud and other charges in connection with a “high-yield investment scheme” in which hundreds of investors lost $56 million.

Norman Schmidt, of Denver was found guilty of conspiracy to commit securities fraud, mail fraud, and wire fraud in addition to money laundering. Charles Lewis, of Littleton, Colo., was found guilty of conspiracy, mail fraud, wire fraud, securities fraud and money laundering. George Alan Weed, of Benton, Ill., was convicted of mail fraud, wire fraud, and securities fraud, and Michael Duane Smith, of Colbert, Wash., was convicted securities fraud. Schmidt is seeking appeal.

Two others have pleaded guilty in the scheme: Janice McClain Schmidt, of Denver, sentenced to nine years in prison, and George Beros of Shaker Heights, Ohio, who awaits sentencing. One other alleged participant in the fraud, Peter A. W. Moss, was indicted but is apparently in the United Kingdom. The U.S. Attorney’s Office is attempting to extradite him.

California Can Not Require Higher Standards for NASD Arbitration

Published on: June 11, 2007 | by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP

The California Supreme Court and a U.S. Court of Appeals have both determined that securities arbitration standards do not violate the California Constitution. The courts have instead decided that The Federal Arbitration Act preempts (is superior to) California’s ability to govern securities arbitration.

Rapidly growing arbitration is forcing consumers to, often unknowingly, forego their right to go to court. To protect its citizens from injustices in arbitration the California legislature passed legislation in 2001 ordering the California court system to create ethical standards for commercial arbitrators. Comprehensive standards were then created regarding arbitrators, including disclosure and conflict-of-interest checks.

The NASD’s Arbitration Code is not consistent with these new standards and the NASD refused to make adjustments to comply with the California requirements. It instead sued members of the California court system in federal court seeking a ruling that California could not set standards regarding securities arbitration. In November 2002, the US Court dismissed the lawsuit holding the US Constitution barred the suit in federal court.

Former Wood River Partners LP Hedge Fund Manager Pleads Guilty to $88 Million Securities Fraud Scheme

Published on: June 8, 2007 | by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP

John H. Whittier, a former hedge fund manager and the founder of Wood River Partners LP and its offshore company in the Cayman Island, has pled guilty to carrying out a securities fraud scheme that cost investors $88 million. Whittier had been charged with four counts of securities fraud for his part in the scheme that mislead investors into thinking that he was keeping risks minimal while pursuing a broad and diverse investment strategy when in fact, he was doing the opposite.

He knowingly failed to make the mandatory public filings that would have revealed his concentrated holdings with one stock. In addition, after acquiring 80% of Endwave Corp’s common stock, he hid any interest earned by not making beneficial-ownership disclosures to the SEC. He also placed 80% of his U.S. hedge fund’s $127 million portfolio in Endwave, instead of placing the money in different investments as he had promised investors. He had vowed that only 10% of the fund’s money would be invested in an one stock.

Aside from owning the hedge funds in the U.S. and abroad, Whittier also owned and controlled a capital management company, which served as the investment adviser to the funds.