Texas Securities Fraud

Texas Lawyer Pleads Guilty to Involvement in Alleged $100M Life Settlement Scheme

Published on: December 7, 2010 | by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP

Texas attorney Russel Mackert has pleaded guilty to charges related to his involvement in an alleged $100 million life settlement fraud scheme that targeted over 800 investors. A number of the investors that Mackert scammed were retirees.

The Department of Justice says that Mackert, who was the attorney for a number of A & O entities, issued material misrepresentations, such as false statements, to investors about A&O Resource Management Ltd. and the related entities. This included making misstatements about the use of and safekeeping of investors’ money and the risks involved with the company’s products. Mackert is accused of marketed over $100 million of fraudulent investments to over 800 victims in the United States and Canada. Investors suffered over $19 million in financial losses.

Mackert has admitted to facilitating the false sale of A & O and making up a fictional person to play the role of the company’s representative. He also has admitted that he failed to let investors know that most of their investments were being used for purposes totally unrelated to the buying and maintaining of life settlement portfolios. He smuggled the cashiers’ checks outside the country in an attempt to open offshore bank accounts for hiding the ill-gotten gains.

The criminal charges against Mackert include smuggling $10 million in undeclared cashier’s checks outside the US and criminal information alleging conspiracy to commit mail fraud. Mackert is facing a maximum 5 years behind bars on the smuggling conviction and 20 years on the conspiracy charge. He also faces a $250,000 fine for each count.

Related Web Resources:
Lawyer in A&O Case Enters Guilty Plea in $100M Scam, The Life Settlements Report, November 24, 2010
Lawyer for A&O Entities Pleads Guilty for His Role in $100 Million Fraud Scheme Involving Life Settlements, US Department of Justice, November 23, 2010
Institutional Investor Securities Blog
Continue Reading ›

Federal and State Securities Acts’ Anti-Waiver Provisions Did Not Bar International Forum Selection Clause’s Enforcement, Says Texas Court of Appeals

Published on: December 2, 2010 | by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP

The Court of Appeals of Texas has held that in a shareholder agreement regarding the purchase of company stock, the federal and state Securities Acts anti-waiver provisions did not bar the enforcement of an international forum selection clause. The parties had consented to the exclusive jurisdiction of courts in Ontario, Canada to adjudicate any disputes stemming from or related to the shareholder agreement or/and the purchase, sale or holding of company common shares. Securities laws were only impacted where parties exercised their rights to voluntarily take part in a contract mandating that lawsuits be brought in courts and under another country’s laws. Also, public policy was in strong favor of enforcing forum selection clauses.

Commenting upon the ruling, Shepherd Smith Edwards and Kantas Founder and Stockbroker Fraud Attorney William Shepherd noted: “The vast majority of securities loss claims filed in the past 20 years have been decided in arbitration. With international arbitration forums becoming more prevalent as economies globalize, this change was inevitable. It is very important for investors to hire attorneys with experience in securities arbitration to seek recovery of securities losses. Over the past 20 years, our firm has represented thousands of investors nationwide – and worldwide – in securities arbitration.”

Related Web Resources:
Young v. Vault.X Holdings, Inc.

Arbitration and Mediation, FINRA Continue Reading ›

Texas Securities Fraud: National Futures Association Takes Emergency Enforcement Action Against International Commodity Advisors and Its Principals

Published on: November 22, 2010 | by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP

The National Futures Association says it has taken an emergency enforcement action against International Commodity Advisors and its principals Gustave O. Woehr and Gregory W. Seitz. ICA, a Commodity Trading Advisor, has offices in Dallas, Texas and Marietta, Georgia.

NFA claims that ICA is soliciting or operating funds as a Commodity Pool Operator even though the CTA isn’t registered as a CPO. Because ICA and its principals have been unable to produce records, books, and other required information, NFA says that it is not able to identify the pool’s participants or determine the investments’ value or assets’ location.

The Associate Responsibility Action (ARA) and the Member Responsibility Action (MRA) prohibit ICA and its two principals from accepting or soliciting funds from customers, pools, or investors. The three parties are also not allowed to transfer or disburse the funds of pools, customers, or investors without the approval of the NFA. Also, ICA and its principals must either show that CPO registration is not required or register as one with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission and give NFA an approved disclosure document.

The ARA and MRA will stay in effect until ICA and its principals show to the NFA’s satisfaction that they are in full compliance with all NFA Requirements. NFA members that have accounts that are controlled by ICA, Woehr, Seitz, or any entity or person acting for any of them and who receive notice of the MRA and ARA are not allowed to transfer or disburse funds to ICA and the two principals or any entity controlled by any of them without NFA approval.

NFA takes emergency enforcement action against International Commodity Advisors and its principals, NFA, November 17, 2010
Commodity Pool Operator
Continue Reading ›

Multimillion Texas Stock Sale Fraud Results in Multiple Indictments

Published on: November 16, 2010 | by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP

Federal court prosecutors have issued new information regarding the securities fraud allegations made against an ex-Tiki Island resident and nine of his accomplices. Harris Dempsey “Butch” Ballow faces charges related to a seven-year multimillion-dollar stock sale scam.

Ballow, 67, was indicted in 2003 for alleged money laundering and fraud. He pleaded guilty to the money laundering charge, agreed to cooperate with the US Securities and Exchange Commission, and was released on $100,000 bond. However, he didn’t show up for his sentencing hearing and left the country. An arrest warrant was issued in 2004.

As a fugitive, Barrow is accused of using numerous aliases, including the names Tom Brown, John Gel, Marty Twinley, and Melvyn John Gelsthorpe. He allegedly used these names to control the following publicly traded companies: Medra, E-SOL International, Aztec Technology Partners (known as Ultimate Lifestyles), and Deep Earth Resources. He was living in Puerto Aventuras, Mexico on 2008 but disappeared the following year after allegedly persuading an investor to transfer $5 million to one of his companies. Mexican federal police finally arrested him at his home in Puerto Vallarta last July.

Also charged with wire fraud are Ballow’s wife Robin Harless Ballow, ex-Houston residents Ruben Garza Perez and Kelly Lyn Boothe, Austin, Texas attorney Patrick Lanier, Jeffrey Janssen Anuth, and five others. According to authorities, the defendants allegedly sold stock shares in the companies that Ballow acquired and controlled while he was a fugitive. They also are accused of concealing Ballow’s real name when they sold the stock to investors, issuing false information to raise and maintain stocks’ value, and not taking away the restrictions that kept investors from selling the stock and land ownership interests in a real estate development that never became a reality.

Related Web Resources:
Harris Dempsey “Butch” Ballow and Nine Others Charged with Allegedly Executing Stock Fraud Scheme While Ballow was a Fugitive from Justice, FBI, November 2, 2010
Indictments detail multimillion stock sale fraud, Galveston Daily News, November 4, 2010
‘Butch’ Ballow: A Wanted Man Click 2 Houston, December 9, 2009
Institutional Investor Securities Blog

Texas Securities Fraud, Stockbroker Fraud Blog Continue Reading ›

Texas Securities Fraud: M25 Investments Inc., M37 Investments LLC, and Two Individuals Must Pay $16.2M Over Alleged Forex and Ponzi Scams

Published on: November 8, 2010 | by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP

M37 Investments LLC, M25 Investments Inc., Jeffery Lyon, and Scott Kear Sr. have settled for $16.2 million Commodity Futures Trading Commission charges involving the alleged defrauding of over 200 individuals in a foreign currency scheme. Many of the investment fraud victims were senior investors. The Texas securities fraud agreement was reached between the parties in district court.

The CFTC contends that the defendants solicited about $8 million from approximately 213 individuals to trade off-exchange leveraged foreign currency,
commodity futures contracts, and forex options. The commission says that between December 2007 and September 2009, investors in Texas, West Virginia, Maryland, and Mississippi, and other states were solicited for the trades. Many of the seniors who were targeted were solicited through their churches.

The defendants are accused of guaranteeing investors renewal bonuses, if they reinvested, in addition to guaranteed interest payments on investments. The investors were also allegedly told that “profitable trading” would garner returns. Unfortunately, what ended up happening is that most of the investors’ funds didn’t go toward trading and what was traded resulted in substantial losses.

CFTC says that the few funds that M35 and M25 paid to investors was money that had come from other clients. Because of this, CFTC contends, the two firms ended up running Ponzi scams. The agency also is accusing the defendants of covering up the securities fraud with monthly statement accounts that gave clients the false impression that they were making the 2% monthly interest that they had been promised.

Jointly and severally the defendants will pay $7.404 million in restitution. The two companies will jointly and severally pay a fine of $7.1 million. Lyon’s fine is $375,00 and Kear will pay $1.4 million.

Related Web Resources:
Federal Court Orders More than $16.2 Million in Customer Restitution and Monetary Penalties against Texas Defendants Scott P. Kear, Sr., Jeffery L. Lyon and their Firms in CFTC Anti-Fraud Action, CFTC, October 27, 2010
Read the Complaint (PDF)

Texas Securities Fraud, Stockbroker Fraud Blog
Institutional Investor Securities Blog
Continue Reading ›

Texas Securities Fraud: Man Admits to $1.7 Million Investment Scam Involving Therapeutic Horseshoes

Published on: November 2, 2010 | by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP

Samuel Serritella, 66, has pleaded guilty to securities fraud. He reportedly received some $1.7 million from 300 investors.

Serritella has admitted that he convinced investors to purchase unregistered shares in International Surfacing Inc. the New Jersey-based company he was chairman, chief financial officer, and president of that was supposedly going to make therapeutic horseshoes to help horses get ready for the Olympics.

Serritella, who was not authorized to sell securities in the state, is accused of making the share sales between February 2004 and May 2006, placing investors’ funds into several bank accounts that were under his control, and using the money to pay for personal expenses (including travel, hotel bills, tavern expenses, and medical bills) and lend $84,000 to three friends.

While Serritella did use some of the money for startup expenses and payments to the company contracted to help make the horseshoes, prosecutors say he never actually purchased the equipment for manufacturing them. He had also charged Serritella with theft by deception, money laundering, misapplication of entrusted property, and misconduct by a corporate official,

As Texas Securities Fraud Lawyer William Shepherd, noted, “100 years ago it was legal in Texas to shoot a horse thief; but getting scammed into investing in “orthopedic shoes” for horses? The “buyer-beware” principle may apply.

Serritella will have to pay back his investor. If convicted, he could end up behind bars for up to a decade.

Related Web Resources:
NJ man admits $1.7M fraud involving horseshoes, Washington Post, October 25, 2010
Garfield man charged with bilking investors of $1.7M, NJ Newsroom, July 21, 2009 Continue Reading ›

Morgan Stanley’s Motion to Bar Ex-Hedge Fund Promoter Conrad Seghers from Pursuing FINRA Arbitration in Texas Securities Case is Granted by District Court

Published on: October 27, 2010 | by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP

A district court has granted plaintiff Morgan Stanley’s motion that Conrad Seghers, a former hedge fund promoter, be preliminarily barred from pursuing Financial Industry Regulatory Authority arbitration proceeding against the broker-dealer over the way over his accounts were allegedly mishandled. Judge Denise L. Cote said that Seghers waved the right to arbitrate by proceeding with his Texas securities lawsuit when he litigated with earlier action. The dispute between the investment bank and Seghers has been going on for nearly a decade.

According to the court, a number of hedge funds and related entities run by Seghers and his associates opened accounts with Morgan Stanley in 1999. In 2001, Seghers and his partners accused the broker-dealer of serious errors that allegedly caused the funds’ value to sustain huge financial hits. A major investor in a Segher hedge fund would go on to file a Texas securities fraud complaint against the fund promoter, the funds, and his partners.

The following year, a number of the funds sued Morgan Stanley in court. The Texas securities dispute went to NASD (now FINRA) arbitration and the case was eventually settled.

When Seghers sued Morgan Stanley for $35 million in federal court over the investment bank’s allegedly fraudulent misstatements that led to the funds to drop in value, the lawsuit was dismissed as untimely under the Texas limitations period of four years. Seghers chose not to appeal the ruling.

However, not long after, one of the funds founded by Seghers that had traded assets through the Morgan Stanley accounts filed NASD arbitration proceedings accusing the investment bank of breach of contract and fraud related to the same alleged misconduct as the federal district court action. A court in New York dismissed the case as untimely.

This April, Seghers commenced a FINRA arbitration against Morgan Stanley. In July, the investment bank filed a complaint seeking declaratory judgment that the hedge fund promoter waived his right to arbitrate because of his earlier lawsuit, as well as due to the fact that the Texas arbitration was time-barred. The court granted Morgan Stanley’s motion.

Related Web Resources:
Arbitration and Mediation, FINRA Continue Reading ›

BP Oil Spill Payouts Recipients May Be Targeted by Investment Scam Fraudsters, Says SEC

Published on: October 22, 2010 | by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP

The Securities and Exchange Commission is warning small businesses and individuals to watch out for fraudsters out there that may be targeting the recipients of BP oil spill payments with investment opportunities that promise high returns at little or no risk or involve complex or secretive strategies. Because of their tendency to share information with each other and the high level of trust that exists among its members, professional organizations, ethnic communities, religious groups, and other close-knit affinity groups may be likely targets.

The SEC says that one way to avoid becoming involved in this type of investment fraud is to ask lots of questions and then double check the with the agency or an unbiased source. Also. it is important to make sure that the investment is registered and the seller is licensed.

According to SEC Chairman Mary Schapiro, “We are on the lookout for any securities scams in the Gulf area.” Following Hurricane Katrina, the SEC discovered a number of scams targeting individuals that were compensated by their insurance companies. Fraud schemes included promoters claiming that their companies were taking part in clean-up efforts, trading programs that made false promises of high returns, and Ponzi scams.

SEC Warns of Potential Investment Scams Targeting Recipients of BP Oil Spill Payouts, SEC, October 13, 2010
Investor Alert – BP Payout Recipients: Be on the Lookout for Investment Scams
Continue Reading ›

Morgan Keegan to Pay $9.2M to Investors in Texas Securities Fraud Case Involving Risky Bond Funds

Published on: October 6, 2010 | by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP

In a Texas securities case, FINRA arbitration panel has ordered Morgan Keegan & Co., a Regions Financial Corp., to pay 18 investors $9.2M for losses related to risky bond funds. The investors contend that the investment firm committed securities fraud when it convinced them to invest in certain funds that included high-risk “subprime” mortgage assets. Clients also claimed that they were persuaded to automatically reinvest dividends in the funds.

This is the biggest award that an arbitration panel has awarded in a Morgan Keegan case involving six bond funds that were heavily involved in mortgage-related holdings. The funds dropped in value significantly in 2007 and 2008. Hundreds of securities claims against the brokerage firm followed. Last July, Regions Financial announced that Morgan Keegan had recorded a $200M charge for probable costs of the bond fund lawsuits.

Arbitrators in Houston made the ruling in the Texas securities case. Included in the total sum was $1.1M in legal fees that, per state law, will be paid to investors. All of the investors involved were clients of Russell W. Stein, a Morgan Keegan broker. Stein is no longer with the broker-dealer. Regulatory filings indicate that he is currently employed with Raymond James Financial Inc. unit Raymond James & Associates Inc.

Stein and his wife were original claimants in this Texas securities fraud case. They too had invested in the bond funds. Their claims are now part of another case involving a group of other investors. Morgan Keegan is considering appealing the FINRA arbitration panel’s decision.

Related Web Resources:
Morgan Keegan to pay bond fund investors $9.2 mln, Reuters, October 6, 2010
Morgan Keegan Must Pay $9.2Mln To Investors – Panel, Wall Street Journal, October 6, 2010
Morgan Keegan Ordered by FINRA Panel to Pay Investor $2.5 Million for Bond Fund Losses, Stockbroker Fraud Blog, February 23, 2010
Morgan Keegan Again Ordered by Arbitrators to Pay Bond Fund Losses to Investors, Stockbroker Fraud Blog, October 27, 2009
Financial Industry Regulatory Authority
Continue Reading ›

$2.6M Texas Securities Fraud Settlement: Hedge Fund Adviser Settles SEC Allegations Involving Violations Related to Improper Public Stock Offering Participation After Short Selling

Published on: October 5, 2010 | by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP

Carlson Capital L.P. has agreed to pay over $2.6 million to resolve charges that it wrongly participated in 4 public stock offerings after short selling the same securities. The Texas securities fraud charges were brought by the Securities and Exchange Commission against the a Dallas-based hedge fund adviser. By agreeing to settle for $2,653,234, Carlson Capital is not denying or admitting to the allegations of securities misconduct.

According to the SEC, the Texas hedge fund violated Rule 105 four times and lacked adequate procedures and policies to keep the firm from taking part in the relevant offerings. During one occasion, Carlson Capital allegedly violated the rule even though the portfolio manager that purchased the offering shares and the one that sold short the stock were not the same person. The SEC determined that Rule 105’s “separate accounts” exception, which allows the purchase of an offered security in an account that is “separate” from the account used through which the same security was sold short, did not apply in this case. The SEC also found that the portfolio manager that sold short the stock during the restricted period had been given information indicating that the other portfolio manager was planning on buying the offerings.

Rule 105 of Regulation M
This rule helps prevent short selling, which can lower the proceeds received by shareholders and companies by artificially depressing the market price not long before the company issues its public offering price. Rule 105 is there to make sure that the natural forces of supply and demand, and not manipulation, sets the offering price. The short sale of an equity security during the restricted period and the purchase of the same security through the offering are prohibited.

During the SEC’s investigation into the allegations, Carlson Capital implemented remedial steps, including putting into place an automated system that assists in the review of the firm’s previous short sales prior to it taking part in offerings.