Investor Lawyers Blog

Stifel, Nicolaus & Co. and AXA Advisors Broker Charged in Ponzi Scheme Victimizing Church Members

Published on: November 5, 2009 | by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP

Former Stifel, Nicolaus & Co. and AXA Advisors broker Kenneth Neely has pled guilty to one count of mail fraud for setting up a Ponzi scheme that targeted at least 16 investors. Yesterday, Missouri Secretary of State Robin Carnahan announced that she has shut down the scam.

The 56-year-old St. Peters, Missouri broker got his clients to invest in a bogus St. Charles real estate investment trust. He promised high return rates and “no risk,” raising over $640,000 in investor funds. Federal prosecutors say clients paid about $3,000/share or unit.

At the time Neely was committing securities fraud (from 2001 – July 2009) he worked for broker dealers AXA Advisors and Stifel, Nicolaus & Co. He told clients to make checks payable to him and his wife.

Missouri Securities Law makes it illegal for a broker to “sell away,” which involves selling investments off a firm’s books.

Neely has 30 days to respond to Missouri’s cease-and-desist order. Federal brokers have barred him from working as a broker. Investor victims that lost some $400,000 included people that belonged to his church, friends, relatives, and acquaintances. Some people lost their savings because of the Ponzi scheme. Nealy used some of the money to pay for his personal expenses and debt.

Neely’s sentencing is scheduled for January 2010. He faces up to 20 years in prison, restitution, and up to $250,000 in fines.

Related Web Resources:
Carnahan Uncovers Ponzi Scheme in Saint Charles, SOS.Mo.Gov, November 4, 2009
St. Peters broker admits Ponzi scheme, St. Louis Business Journal, November 4, 2009
FINRA Permanently Bars Former Broker for Stifel, Nicolaus & Co. Inc and AXA Advisors For Ponzi Scheme, Stockbroker Fraud Blog, August 3, 2009 Continue Reading ›

CIT Group Bankruptcy Exposes Fraud Against Many Investors Who Were Sold Preferred Stocks And Bonds

Published on: November 3, 2009 | by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP

Many investors were told that investing in CIT preferred stock and bonds was safe and appropriate for them. Some sales pitches were based on the $2.3 billion government bailout of CIT. This is just another example of material misrepresentations and omissions in the sale of fixed income products, which have become rampant on Wall Street.

There are some reports that misrepresentations were made to sell CIT securities to smaller institutions and individuals even as Wall Street and large institutions were unloading their own holdings of CIT. This is similar to claims made concerning the sales of auction-rate securities and recommendations prior to the Lehman, Fannie Mae, and Freddie Mac debacles.

This week, the 101-year-old commercial lender announced that it is filing for bankruptcy in an attempt to get rid of $10 billion in debt. Not only has CIT run out of funding, but also a US bailout and debt exchange offer faltered.

CIT says it will continue to stay in business and that bankruptcy will allow the commercial lender to keep providing funding to middle-market and small business clients.

With $64.9 billion in debt and assets valued at $71 billion, it is unlikely that the government will recover a lot of the $2.3 billion in taxpayer money that the commercial lender received under the Troubled Asset Relief Program.

CIT says bondholder support will allow it to get out of bankruptcy pretty quickly-two months is its current estimate. A prepackaged bankruptcy plan has been approved.

CIT’s prepackaged plan outline stated that majority of noteholders would get new notes at 70 cents on the dollar in addition to new common stock.

CIT is the country’s biggest lender to mid-sized and small businesses. CIT funds some 1 million businesses. It is the number one aircraft financier and the number three biggest US railcar-leasing firm. CIT finances trades in North America, Europe, and Asia.

Related Web Resources:
CIT Files Bankruptcy; U.S. Unlikely to Recoup Money, Bloomberg.com, Nov 1, 2009
Lender CIT files for bankruptcy, Portland Business Journal, November 2, 2009
Troubled Asset Relief Program, Federal Reserve
Chapter 11 Bankruptcy
Continue Reading ›

SEC to Probe Whether Former Ferris, Baker Watts Inc. General Counsel Failed to Properly Supervise Broker Convicted of Securities Fraud

Published on: November 2, 2009 | by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP

The US Securities and Exchange Commission says it will investigate allegations that former Ferris, Baker Watts Inc. general counsel Theodore W. Urban did not properly supervise Stephen Glantz. In 2007, Glantz, who was employed by Ferris for almost thee years, pleaded guilty to lying to law enforcement officials and securities fraud.

The SEC says Urban ignored a number of warnings he received connecting Glantz to questionable activities and unauthorized trades. Urban also allegedly knew that numerous complaints had already been made against Glantz even before he came to work at Ferris. Not only did Glantz’s Form U-4 registration application show 10 customer complaints, but others had warned about his questionable reputation. Yet Urban still gave the broker more freedom than he did other brokers at the firm.

Urban is a former SEC staffer who was an Assistant Director in the Division of Market Regulation. In 2004, he recommended that Ferris, Baker Watts fire Glantz over unsuitable trades involving customer accounts. Urban later backed down from his stance. Instead, he and vice chairman Louis Akers were in agreement that Glantz be put under “special supervision.”

Glantz, another registered representative at another broker-dealer, and Glantz’ client David Dadante, were accused of manipulating the market for Innotrac Corp. Glantz also made unsuitable and unauthorized trades in a number of securities in his customers’ accounts.

Urban, according to his attorney, will contest the allegations.

Royal Bank of Canada subsidiary RBC Wealth Management acquired Ferris for $230 million in 2008.

While financial losses do occur when investing in the market, investor losses that are a result of broker fraud are unacceptable. You shouldn’t have to suffer because a broker or broker-dealer was negligent or engaged in misconduct.

Scottrade Fined $600,000 by FINRA for Inadequate Anti-Money Laundering Program

Published on: October 30, 2009 | by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP

This week, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority announced that it is fining Scottrade $600,000 for failing to put into place and work with an adequate anti-money laundering program that would have allowed it to identify and report suspect transactions. FINRA says that by failing to meet this requirement, Scottrade violated the Bank Secrecy Act and FINRA rules.

According to FINRA, each broker-dealer must have its own anti-money laundering procedures, policies, and controls that are customized to its business model. FINRA says that between April 2003 and April 2008, Scottrade neglected to implement an AML program that did this. Scottrade’s business model is primarily online.

Scottrade was handling about 49,000 trades daily in 2003. By 2007, the brokerage firm was handling some 150,000 trades a day.

FINRA says that the brokerage firm’s online business model and growing trade volume increased the chances of hacking, identity theft, money laundering, and securities law violations. Yet, according to FINRA Enforcement chief and executive vice president Susan Merrill, Scottrade did not even have an automatic or systematic surveillance system in place until January 2005-and she says the new system proved inadequate. Before then, Scottrade used a manual system for monitoring accounts and relied on cashiering, branch, and margin employees to identify and report possibly suspect activity.

FINRA also says that the brokerage firm’s AML procedures did not provide adequate written guidelines for employees on how to identify when a transaction was suspicious. Its AML analysts also allegedly did not receive sufficient written guidelines on detecting and probing possibly suspect trade activity.

Scottrade is not agreeing to or denying the allegations. However, the brokerage firm has agreed to an entry of FINRA’s findings. A Scottrade spokesperson says enhancements to the broker-dealer’s anti-money laundering program have now been made.

Related Web Resources:
Scottrade Fined $600,000 for Inadequate Anti-Money Laundering Program, FINRA, October 26, 2009
Anti-Money Laundering (AML) Source Tool for Broker-Dealers, SEC
The Bank Secrecy Act, IRS.gov Continue Reading ›

Citigroup, AK Capital, National Financial Services, and Tradestation Fined and Censured by NYSER Over Trade Violations

Published on: October 29, 2009 | by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP

The New York Stock Exchange Regulation Inc. has censured and fined four firms for trade violations. The four investment firms, Citigroup, AK Capital, National Financial Services, and Tradestation, agreed to the censures and fines but did not admit to or deny wrongdoing.

According to NYSER:

• Citigroup Global Markets Inc. allegedly cancelled 365 market-on-close (MOC) orders after the cutoff time at 3:40 ET on four 2007 trade dates and submitted, between December 9 2008 and January 5, 2009, 12,480 limited-on-close (LOC) orders after the cutoff time on 18 trade dates. Citigroup was ordered to pay a $150,000 fine.

• National Financial Services, LLC employees allegedly engaged in wrongdoing related to LOC and MOC orders it made on eight trade dates between 2006 and 2008. NFS also allegedly neglected to properly supervise these employees. The firm agreed to a $75,000 fine.

• Tradestation allegedly failed to oversee and put into place adequate internal compliance controls, took part in conduct not in line with the fair and equitable trade principals involving odd-lot orders, and neglected to find out necessary facts about certain orders and clients. Tradestation agreed to a $100,000 fine.

• AK Capital allegedly failed to use background checks on employees, failed to set up written policies designed to prevent the misuse of material nonpublic data, and failed to review trade confirmations and certain clients’ monthly account statements. The NYSE Arca options-trader registrant also allegedly neglected to keep records and books that accurately showed all liabilities, assets, capital accounts, and income expenses. The firm agreed to a $20,000 fine.

Related Web Resource:
Monthly Disciplinary Actions – October 2009, NYSE Regulation Continue Reading ›

Morgan Keegan Again Ordered by Arbitrators to Pay Bond Fund Losses to Investors

Published on: October 27, 2009 | by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP

Morgan Keegan & Co. has been ordered to pay $51,000 to Larry and Diane Papasan. Larry Papasan is Memphis Light, Gas and Water Division’s former president.

The Papasans filed their arbitration claim against Morgan Keegan last year after they lost about $80,000 in the account they had with the investment firm. The Papasans’ claim is one of many arbitration cases and securities fraud lawsuits filed by Morgan Keegan investors who sustained RMK fund losses. The general accusation is that the broker-dealer misrepresented the volatility of the bond funds, which they allegedly were not managing conservatively.

Larry Papasan, who is retired, opened his account because he knew John Wilfong, a former Morgan Keegan financial adviser. Wilfong felt so confident about the bond funds that he even sold them to his mother, Joyce Wilfong, who also went on to suffer financial losses from her investment. Her friend Maxine Street also suffered bond fund losses.

The two women filed a joint arbitration claim against Morgan Keegan. Joyce was awarded $68,000, while Street settled for an undisclosed sum.

According to the Papasans, John Wilfong spoke with Jim Kelsoe, the RMK funds’ manager, prior to leaving Morgan Keegan for UBS. Kelsoe allegedly told Wilfong not to liquidate because the funds were safe. The Morgan Keegan fund manager is named in other cases for allegedly failing to disclose the risks associated with the mutual fund investments.

Related Web Resources:
Latest RMK Award Goes to Ex- MLGW Head, Memphis Daily News, October 27, 2009
Two Morgan Keegan Funds Crash and Burn, Kiplinger, December 2007 Continue Reading ›

JP Morgan to Repurchase $480 Million in ARS from Michigan Investors

Published on: October 24, 2009 | by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP

JPMorgan Chase & Co. is offering to repurchase $480 million in auction-rate securities from investors in Michigan. The full buybacks are for investors who bought ARS between 2006 and early 2008. JPMorgan’s offer is part of a settlement that it reached with the Michigan Office of Financial and Insurance Regulation.

The broker-dealer is also paying the state of Michigan $664,000 to settle allegations that it misled clients into thinking that the ARS they were buying were liquid like cash. 90% of the settlement went to the state’s general fund, while 10% was deposited in the OFIR’s Michigan Investor Protection Trust.

OFIR also reached similar agreements with Citigroup, Banc of America Securities, Merrill Lynch, Comerica, and Wachovia. The state of Michigan has negotiated over $3.5 billion in payments for investors and received over $6.5 million.

Many investors were caught off guard when their ARS accounts froze after the market collapsed. Many broker-dealers were accused of misleading clients and making it seem as if auction-rate securities were as liquid as cash.

Michigan is not the first state that JPMorgan Chase & Co. has settled with over allegations that it misled clients about ARS. In August 2008, JP Morgan Chase, along with Morgan Stanley, agreed to give back more than $7 billion to ARS investors as part of the settlement they reached with New York State Attorney General Andrew M. Cuomo.

Related Web Resources:
OFIR Announces $480 Million Auction Rate Securities Settlement with JPMorgan Chase, MichNews.org, October 8, 2009
Cuomo Settles JP Morgan, Morgan Stanley ARS Claims, CFO, August 14, 2008
Michigan Office of Financial and Insurance Regulation
Continue Reading ›

Two Dresdner Kleinwort Traders Censured for Market Abuse by UK’s FSA

Published on: October 21, 2009 | by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP

Two Dresdner Kleinwort traders were censured for market abuse by the United Kingdom’s Financial Services Authority. According to the FSA, Darren Morton had access to inside information about a possible new issue of Barclays floating-rate bonds in March 2007 that would offer more favorable terms than the last issue.

The FSA says that Morton shared what he knew with trader Christopher Perry and the two men sold the whole holding of the previous issue held by K2, a Dresdner investment vehicle with a portfolio containing $65 million of Barclay’s FRNs. That same day, a new issue was announced, and counterparties that bought the bonds from K2 lost some $66,000.

Rather than accept the FSA’s offer to settle and receive a fine and/or penalty at a lower amount, the two men took their case to the FSA’s tribunal authority. The regulatory committee found that the two men did not realize that they were engaging in market abuse.

While the two men were censured, they were not fined and their right to work was not challenged. The FSA cited a number of factors to explain the sanction chosen:

• The two did not make money personally from the trade.
• They have undergone market abuse training.
• No one gave them proper guidance.
• Their compliance and disciplinary records are clean.

FSA enforcement director Margaret Cole, however, noted that insider dealing is cheating regardless of the market. She promised that future offenders will be slapped with harsher sanctions.

Related Web Resources:
The FSA and the intriguing case of Dresdner Kleinwort bond managers, Guardian.co.UK, October 7, 2009
SA censures Dresdner traders over market abuse, MarketWatch, October 7, 2009
Financial Services Authority
Continue Reading ›

Elder Securities Fraud: FINRA Bars Former Broker From Industry

Published on: October 20, 2009 | by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority has barred former broker Sergio M. Del Toro from the industry for allegedly defrauding an elderly investor, age 90, of over half a million dollars. Del Toro has agreed to the bar but is not admitting to or denying wrongdoing.

FINRA says that between 2004 and 2006, Del Toro recommended that the elderly investor, who died in 2006, invest $511,000 in 3rd Dimensions Inc, a speculative, development-stage company. FINRA is accusing Del Toro of promising to buy back at $400,000 the securities that the senior investor had bought for $351,000 if the latter was dissatisfied. The elderly client bought additional stock at Del Toro’s suggestion. The former broker received about $76,650 in commissions.

FINRA claims that not only did the client pay $3-$4 for 3rd Dimension stock, which was not appropriate given the investor’s financial situation and age, but also, Del Toro allegedly did not have any reasonable grounds for valuing the stock at those prices when he sold them to his client.

FINRA claims Del Toro knew 3rd Dimension was making little if no revenue at the time and did not notify the two broker-dealers that he was registered with about his activities.

Elder Financial Fraud
Unfortunately, elderly senior investors can be easy prey for brokers that are willing to take advantage of them. It can be devastating to have your life savings (that you worked so hard for and hoped could cover your retirement or be passed on to your children and grandchildren) stolen from you by a financial professional.

Elder investment fraud is a crime. It is also a form of elder abuse when the victim is an older senior investor. Continue Reading ›

Market Timing Violations Against AG Edwards & Sons Inc. Supervisors and Broker Upheld by the SEC

Published on: October 17, 2009 | by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP

The US Securities and Exchange Commission is upholding the market timing violations against two AG Edwards and Sons Inc. supervisors and one of its stockbrokers. Billions of dollars were involved in the mutual fund market timing transactions.

While market timing, which involves the buying and selling of mutual fund shares in a manner that takes advantage of price inefficiencies, is not illegal, a violation of 1934 Securities Exchange Act Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5. can arise when there is intent to deceive.

Last year, the ALJ found that AG Edwards and Sons brokers Charles Sacco and Thomas Bridge intentionally violated antifraud provisions when they engaged in market timing activities even though they had been restricted from doing so. The ALJ also found that supervisors Jeffrey Robles and James Edge failed to properly supervise the stockbrokers.

The antifraud charges filed against Bridge by the SEC Enforcement Division involved 1,352 trades (representing $1.126 billion) he executed over a two-year period for companies belonging to client Martin Oliner. The Enforcement Division accused Sacco of entering 25,533 market timing trades (representing $4.036 billion) for two hedge fund clients between 5/02 – 9/03.

The SEC determined that Edge, who was Bridge’s supervisor, knew and was complicit in the latter’s actions. Although Robles was not considered to have been complicit in Sacco’s alleged broker fraud, the commission said he should have noticed there were problems.

The SEC ordered Bridge to cease and desist from future violations. He is also barred from associating with any dealers or brokers for five years. Sacco has already settled his broker-fraud case.

Edge is barred from acting in a supervisory role over any dealer or broker for five years. Robles received a similar bar lasting three years. All three men were ordered to pay penalties, while Bridge was ordered to disgorge almost $39,000 plus $16,665.57 in prejudgment interest.

Related Web Resources:
Read the SEC’s Opinion regarding this matter

Commission Sanctions Thomas C. Bridge for Violations of the Antifraud Provisions of the Securities Laws and James D. Edge and Jeffrey K. Robles for Failing to Supervise Reasonably, Trading Markets, September 29, 2009 Continue Reading ›